When LGBTQ+ youth do not feel safe or accepted in their daily lives, they turn to the internet to seek community. Two new studies, conducted by The Trevor Project and Hopelab/Born This Way Foundation, each found that young LGBTQ+ people report greater rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation or attempts when they do not have access to safe online communities.
“The majority of LGBTQ+ young people agreed that they go online to connect with others because it is difficult to do so in their daily lives, with 38% somewhat agreeing and 36% strongly agreeing,” according to The Trevor Project’s study.
The Hopelab study similarly found that 44% of LGBTQ+ young people feel very safe in online spaces, compared to just 9% in person. The research shows that online belonging is particularly important for the mental health of transgender youth.
When LGBTQ+ youth do not feel safe or accepted in their daily lives, they turn to the internet to seek community. Two new studies, conducted by The Trevor Project and Hopelab/Born This Way Foundation, each found that young LGBTQ+ people report greater rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation or attempts when they do not have access to safe online communities.
“The majority of LGBTQ+ young people agreed that they go online to connect with others because it is difficult to do so in their daily lives, with 38% somewhat agreeing and 36% strongly agreeing,” according to The Trevor Project’s study.
The Hopelab study similarly found that 44% of LGBTQ+ young people feel very safe in online spaces, compared to just 9% in person. The research shows that online belonging is particularly important for the mental health of transgender youth.
“Transgender young people often have little control over their physical surroundings or the level of acceptance in their local communities,” the study notes. “However, online spaces can offer an alternative source of support — providing emotional connection, affirming content, and helpful information.”
LGBTQ+ youth remain vulnerable to the potential negative impacts of social media on teens, which have remained a hot topic among U.S. lawmakers for years.
“Even in the face of these risks, LGBTQ+ youth still report using online spaces, possibly due to the variety of benefits they can offer, like a sense of community, support, and resources,” The Trevor Project notes.
These communities foster mutual support. According to Hopelab, 74% of transgender youth reported that they regularly provide encouragement to others online.
Such online communities have become more critical as more than 600 bills affecting LGBTQ+ individuals circulate in the U.S., restricting the expression of queer identity. Twelve states have enacted laws that limit discussions of sexuality and gender identity in schools, potentially isolating LGBTQ+ youth, who already experience worse mental health outcomes due to discrimination and harassment.
The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is particularly relevant, having been reintroduced in May after passing in the Senate last year, but failing in the House during the previous session.
KOSA would enable the government to hold social media platforms legally accountable for failing to adequately protect minors from harm.
Under an earlier version of KOSA, LGBTQ+ advocates raised concerns about a provision that would allow individual state attorneys general to determine what content is harmful for children — a concern given ongoing state-level debates over LGBTQ+ rights.
After revision, KOSA would give the FTC enforcement authority. This change addressed concerns from advocacy groups under the Biden administration. But when President Trump was elected in 2024, the leadership of the FTC changed hands, reigniting concerns about potential federal oversight of LGBTQ+ online communities.
“Given the impact of unsupportive environments and experiences on LGBTQ+ youth, many may experience mental health challenges and turn to online platforms for connection and support,” The Trevor Project study says. “Using these reasons to justify limiting access to online platforms could have harmful consequences, possibly increasing isolation and reducing support for LGBTQ+ risk, thereby exacerbating mental health challenges and suicide risk.”
